Search results

Weird... Could you try mine just to test?

Copy what I edited into that one post and see if it works:

Use this:

Get the forum signature code, copy it and paste it at https://freedom.community.tm/account/signature and press save changes.

Still trying to find it... Sadly I can't search on my terrible internet :mad: Edit: I got it: https://cyanlabs.net/youtubesig/

Yeah it's automatic. If you want me to I could try digging up the link again

I didn't even know about that

Well now that they denied that dispute they've probably reviewed it and the video probably isn't in public domain which would be Freedom's algorithm not having gotten rid of it... ... If you had read that only. As of sending your information there the thing is that you in Freedom's case are...

Just a quick note to this: It's a visual bug only and your actual sub count doesn't change on the Backend.

If your application was accepted yes.

Could you send us a screenshot of your YouTube features page?

What reply did you get to that dispute?

This was in a reply to OnlyUltimate. Did you dispute it that way through YouTube though as explained in that support ticket reply? PS: I don't work at Freedom so I can't read support tickets.

That's probably why they unlinked you then.

They are a company Freedom doesn't have access to fully and a company interested in protecting their online content. And that my friend is the best way to get legal issues alongside with channel termination. In appealing a claim you are asked to separately provide who's the person who gave you...

Okay. After getting to the image page I saw you had to put an entire sentence in for that to happen. Try using these tag researchers with only one to two to three words (bleach don't starve, starve bleach,...) Also just don't trust these tag API things like tubebuddy on anything. They're a...

The category is a part of the SEO of the video and YouTube will show it to people in recommendations of similarly categorized videos. On that I'd use Entertainment too as it's what it fits into the most.

What's the site and who claimed that video?

Well it's a fact that the less you use the easier you'll get rid of BS claims. In that case the license didn't work whatsoever and if you'd used less and not deleted the video you could have gotten rid of that BS claim. Licenses are another thing right on the terrible side of YouTube. The...

Well you should try going for more of a Fair Use approach that doesn't make the entire video content from Reuters. The less content you use by them the easier it is to actually turn it into a valid copyright dispute and getting rid of potential claims.